Why collections need to be reported a... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

CreditLitigation.org » FCRA, FDCPA and related cases and filings » LVNV Funding "validation" and bizarre credit reporting » Why collections need to be reported as collections and NOT tradelines « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  Start New Thread        

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Christine
Moderator
Username: Christine

Post Number: 112
Registered: 03-2006
Posted on Sunday, April 30, 2006 - 04:02 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

A collection reported correctly as COLLECTION assigned (or purchased) a few years ago does very little damage to the scores.

The balance and past due amounts reported for a tradeline are often included in the Balance/Limit ratio, the accounts are often rated as CURRENTLY delinquent as of the reporting date or status date (depending on the CRA) and it is rated by numerous FICO score factors.

I've seen FICO scores around 700 with 4+ year old collections reported CORRECTLY as such.

And I've seen 6+ year old collections reported as tradelines -- the only derog account -- and the scores were in the low 600s or even in the 500s.

[5/08 update: the new TU FICO scoring software seem to ignore old tradeline balances]

It is very easy to document the impact of the reporting with the FICO score factors and I can certainly provide an affidavit if anyone needs to document damages in excess of statutory damages.

More info about affidavits
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Christine
Moderator
Username: Christine

Post Number: 209
Registered: 03-2006
Posted on Monday, December 04, 2006 - 05:36 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

After comparing many collections on the Experian and the myFICO reports, it appears that the reporting of collection accounts as INSTALLMENT is causing the reporting as a tradeline.

Type: Installment

To have collections reported as such, dispute the account type with Experian, it should read COLLECTION.

It may well apply to all CRAs, on Equifax I see "open account" a lot, but I haven't confirmed that.

And, while it's USUALLY better to have OLD collections reported as collections, you want to think about this carefully.

The DATE OPENED will be converted to the DATE ASSIGNED by FICO scores.

So you really have to look at all the dates and everything else on your report.

A NEW collection (recently assigned or purchased) instead of the tradeline might actually lower your scores.

If you're sure you want the reporting as collection rather than installment or revolving, dispute the account TYPE and request reporting as COLLECTION.

Of course that's only an issue if they PROPERLY validated the account because they can't legally report at all after your initial dispute with the collector until they validated.

Don't shoot yourself in the foot by demanding the reporting as COLLECTION when they shouldn't report at all.

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration